Email this article Conflict Resolution Ethos on Concessions Users for Privacy Preferences
Abstract
The absence of multi-party protection administration bolster in current standard Social Media foundations makes clients not able to suitably control to whom these things are really shared or not. Computational components that can consolidate the security inclinations of numerous clients into a solitary arrangement for a thing can help take care of this issue. Be that as it may, consolidating numerous clients' protection inclinations is not a simple undertaking, since security inclinations may struggle, so strategies to determine clashes are required. Additionally, these techniques need to consider how clients' would really achieve an understanding about an answer for the contention so as to propose arrangements that can be worthy by the greater part of the clients influenced by the thing to be shared. Current methodologies are either excessively requesting or just consider settled methods for accumulating protection inclinations. In this, we propose the principal computational system to determine clashes for multi-party protection administration in Social Media that can adjust to various circumstances by demonstrating the concessions that clients make to achieve an answer for the contentions.
References
Internet.org, “A focus on efficiency,” http://internet.org/efficiencypaper, Retr. 09/2014.
K. Thomas, C. Grier, and D. M. Nicol, “unfriendly: Multi-party privacy risks in social networks,” in Privacy Enhancing Technologies. Springer, 2010, pp. 236–252.
A. Lampinen, V. Lehtinen, A. Lehmuskallio, and S. Tamminen, “We’re in it together: interpersonal management of disclosure in social network services,” in Proc. CHI. ACM, 2011, pp. 3217– 3226.
P.Wisniewski, H. Lipford, and D.Wilson, “Fighting for my space: Coping mechanisms for sns boundary regulation,” in Proc. CHI. ACM, 2012, pp. 609–618.
A. Besmer and H. Richter Lipford, “Moving beyond untagging: photo privacy in a tagged world,” in ACM CHI, 2010, pp. 1563– 1572.
Facebook NewsRoom, “One billion- key metrics,” http://newsroom.fb.com/download-media/4227, Retr. 26/06/2013.
J. M. Such, A. Espinosa, and A. Garc´ıa-Fornes, “A survey of privacy in multi-agent systems,” The Knowledge Engineering Review, vol. 29, no. 03, pp. 314–344, 2014.
R. L. Fogues, J. M. Such, A. Espinosa, and A. Garcia-Fornes, “Open challenges in relationship-based privacy mechanisms for social network services,” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, no. In press., 2015.
R. Wishart, D. Corapi, S. Marinovic, and M. Sloman, “Collaborative privacy policy authoring in a social networking context,” in POLICY. IEEE, 2010, pp. 1–8.
A. Squicciarini, M. Shehab, and F. Paci, “Collective privacy management in social networks,” in WWW. ACM, 2009, pp. 521–530.
B. Carminati and E. Ferrari, “Collaborative access control in online social networks,” in IEEE CollaborateCom, 2011, pp. 231–240.
H. Hu, G.-J. Ahn, and J. Jorgensen, “Detecting and resolving privacy conflicts for collaborative data sharing in online social networks,” in Proc. ACSAC. ACM, 2011, pp. 103–112. [Online].Available: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2076732.2076747
H. Hu, G. Ahn, and J. Jorgensen, “Multiparty access control for online social networks: model and mechanisms,” IEEE TKDE, 2013.
B. Carminati, E. Ferrari, and A. Perego, “Enforcing access control in web-based social networks,” ACM TISSEC, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 6, 2009.
P. Fong, “Relationship-based access control: protection model and policy language,” in Procs. ACM CODASPY. ACM, 2011, pp. 191–202.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright © 2013, All rights reserved.| ijseat.com
International Journal of Science Engineering and Advance Technology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.Based on a work at IJSEat , Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/deed.en_GB.